InvalidOperationException: Unable to resolve service for type
By FoxLearn 2/4/2025 9:00:56 AM 318
If it fails to resolve one of them, it will throw an exception, such as:
- InvalidOperationException: Unable to resolve service for type
<Type Name>
while attempting to activate<Type Name>
. - ArgumentException: Cannot instantiate implementation type
<Type Name>
for service type<Type Name>
.
The type of exception depends on how you are registering the services.
First, I'll provide a solution, then explore different ways the issue can occur.
The easiest way to resolve this issue is to explicitly register the type and, if necessary, specify how to construct it, particularly for constructor parameters that are primitive types.
For example, Imagine you have a class ApiService
with the following constructor:
public ApiService(string endpointUrl)
To register this service correctly, you would need to explicitly tell the DI container how to create it:
// Registering the ApiService with a primitive parameter builder.Services.AddSingleton<IApiService>(_ => new ApiService("https://api.example.com"));
If you have more than one primitive parameter, it's better to encapsulate them in a dedicated configuration class.
For example, if your ApiService
needs a string
(for the endpoint) and an int
(for the timeout):
public class ApiConfig { public string EndpointUrl { get; set; } public int Timeout { get; set; } }
Then modify the ApiService
constructor:
public ApiService(ApiConfig config, IClient client)
Now, register everything in the container:
builder.Services.AddSingleton<IClient, HttpClient>(); builder.Services.AddSingleton<ApiConfig>(_ => new ApiConfig { EndpointUrl = "https://api.example.com", Timeout = 30 }); builder.Services.AddSingleton<IApiService, ApiService>();
Example Causes and Solutions
Cause 1 - services.AddSingleton<IApiService, ApiService>()
If you attempt to register ApiService
and the constructor takes a primitive parameter, like this:
builder.Services.AddSingleton<IApiService, ApiService>();
You’ll get an exception like:
InvalidOperationException: Unable to resolve service for type ‘System.String’ while attempting to activate ‘ApiService’.
This happens because the DI container doesn’t know how to resolve the string
parameter. The solution is to tell it explicitly how to instantiate the ApiService
, as shown in the earlier solution.
Cause 2 - services.AddSingleton<IApiService>()
When you try to register ApiService
without specifying how to instantiate it, like this:
builder.Services.AddSingleton<IApiService>();
You’ll encounter an exception like:
ArgumentException: Cannot instantiate implementation type ‘IApiService’ for service type ‘IApiService’.
The DI container doesn't know which concrete type to use to resolve IApiService
.
Cause 3 - Missing Registration for Dependent Services
Let’s say you have a controller that depends on IApiService
:
[ApiController] [Route("[controller]")] public class WeatherForecastController : ControllerBase { private readonly IApiService _apiService; public WeatherForecastController(IApiService apiService) { _apiService = apiService; } // Other actions }
If you don’t register IApiService
before attempting to activate WeatherForecastController
, you’ll encounter:
InvalidOperationException: Unable to resolve service for type ‘IApiService’ while attempting to activate ‘Controllers.WeatherForecastController’.
This happens because the container has no idea how to resolve IApiService
.
To avoid these exceptions, always ensure that your services are properly registered with the DI container, particularly if they have constructor parameters that need specific values or types.
- Using the OrderBy and OrderByDescending in LINQ
- Querying with LINQ
- Optimizing Performance with Compiled Queries in LINQ
- MinBy() and MaxBy() Extension Methods in .NET
- SortBy, FilterBy, and CombineBy in NET 9
- Exploring Hybrid Caching in .NET 9.0
- Using Entity Framework with IDbContext in .NET 9.0
- Primitive types in C#